CASE STUDY // MARUSHIKA TECHNOLOGY

38 red flags. One DRHP.
Zero mutual funds.

A small-cap technology IPO that our forensic agents flagged with 38 red flags — including an active DGGI fraud investigation, circular promoter loans, and fabricated supplier invoices. The IPO proceeded anyway.

Verdict

AVOID

Trust Score

12 / 100

Red Flags

38

Critical Issues

8

Forensic Override

YES

COMPANY OVERVIEW

What the DRHP says vs what we found.

Marushika Technology Limited positioned itself as a technology company in the IPO filing. The reality is more complicated: a company operating from a shop in Mayur Vihar, Delhi, that had changed its name three times, with an active GST fraud investigation, and a capital structure designed to maximize promoter extraction.

Every single red flag we found was disclosed in the public DRHP. It was all there — scattered across 400+ pages of legal text. Nobody connected the dots.

Registered Office Shop in Mayur Vihar, Delhi
Name Changes 3 times in recent years
IPO Price Band Rs 117 per share
Promoter Cost Basis Rs 0.64 per share (183x markup)
Receivables 74% of total assets
Cash Conversion 12% (vs 60-80% industry norm)
MF Anchor Participation 0 mutual funds
DGGI Status Active investigation

TOP 10 RED FLAGS

Highlights from 38 total flags.

These are the most significant findings. The full report contains 28 additional flags across governance, financial, and operational categories.

#1 DGGI Investigation CRITICAL

Active investigation by Directorate General of GST Intelligence for fake invoices. The company received goods from Smartgen Infra — an entity with no physical presence at its registered address.

#2 Circular Promoter Loans CRITICAL

Rs 19 Cr in promoter loans that appear circular — money flowing from the company to promoter entities and back. Classic extraction pattern disguised as working capital.

#3 Receivables Concentration CRITICAL

74% of total receivables concentrated in a handful of entities. Cash conversion ratio at 12% — revenue is being recorded but cash is not coming in.

#4 Three Name Changes HIGH

Company changed its name three times in recent years. Each name change coincided with a pivot to a different "trending" sector. Pattern consistent with shell companies seeking IPO valuation.

#5 Registered Office HIGH

Company operates from a shop in Mayur Vihar, Delhi. Same address hosts an undisclosed NGO with promoter connections. Not the profile of a technology company seeking Rs 100 Cr+ valuation.

#6 Auditor Resignation HIGH

Previous auditor resigned mid-term. No audit trail for several key transactions. Replacement auditor is a small firm with limited listed company experience.

#7 Share Pricing HIGH

Shares were allotted to promoters at Rs 0.64 per share. IPO price band: Rs 117. That is a 183x markup. Promoters invested Rs 6.4 Lakh for shares now "worth" Rs 117 Cr.

#8 Anchor Allocation HIGH

Zero mutual funds in anchor allocation. Lead anchor: Saint Capital, which has participated in 110+ IPOs — a pattern consistent with anchor-for-hire arrangements.

#9 GST Fraud Network CRITICAL

Smartgen Infra, a key supplier, has no physical presence. Invoices from this entity appear fabricated. DGGI investigation ongoing. This alone should disqualify the IPO.

#10 Capital Structure HIGH

Multiple rounds of share allotment at face value to promoter-linked entities in the 12 months before IPO filing. Value creation for promoters at the expense of IPO investors.

AGENT VERDICT

AVOID — Forensic override triggered.

The Synthesis Agent initially computed a CAUTION verdict based on weighted scores. However, the Forensic Override mechanism was triggered by two independent critical findings: the DGGI fraud investigation and the circular promoter loan pattern. When forensic override activates, the verdict is automatically downgraded to AVOID regardless of other scores.

AGENT PIPELINE OUTPUT

PROMOTER BEHAVIOR AGENT

Trust score: 12/100. Three name changes, shop-based operations, 183x share markup, undisclosed NGO at same address. Pattern consistent with shell company behavior.

RPT MONITOR AGENT

RPT risk: EXTREME. Rs 19 Cr circular loans. Smartgen Infra fake invoices. 74% receivable concentration in connected entities. Extraction probability: 92%.

SYNTHESIS AGENT

Verdict: AVOID. Confidence: 97%. Forensic override: TRIGGERED. Zero mitigating factors identified. Zero mutual fund participation confirms institutional rejection.

THE TAKEAWAY

This is what ZenoLattice does.

Every IPO. Every filing. Every company. The same forensic depth that found 38 red flags in Marushika Technology's DRHP is applied to every company in our coverage universe — automatically, continuously, and without human bias.

Every red flag was in the public DRHP. Nobody else connected them.

Forensic analysis for every IPO.

Get early access to automated DRHP analysis — the same pipeline that caught Marushika.

Launch Q2 2026